Five-year cost
Security, honestly
Where Webflow loses
What a move costs
Five-year cost
Security, honestly
Where Webflow loses
What a move costs
So the question is not which is better. It is whether what you have is costing you more than moving would. This page is written for that decision, with current numbers and a section listing the six cases where we would tell you to stay exactly where you are.
We sell Webflow, so you should read the rest of this with that in mind. Here is the summary anyway, including the third of it that costs us work.
move if
Pages, a blog, case studies, landing pages, a contact form. That is what Webflow is for, and the whole plugin layer that breaks your WordPress site every few months simply does not exist.
move if
Eight licences, a maintenance retainer and a hosting bill is the normal shape of a WordPress site. Over five years that gap is real money, and the table below shows it.
Stay if
Webflow has hard edges and we would rather you find them here than three weeks into a migration. There is a whole section on this below, and it is not a short one.
Not forty rows with a tick in every Webflow box. Ten, and four of them go to WordPress.
Webflow’s column is its published price list. WordPress’s column is a real stack — managed hosting, eight plugin licences and a maintenance retainer — priced from a 2026 cost index rather than guessed at.
Webflow Premium at $25/mo annual · Kinsta Single at $30/mo annual
Eight licences, renewed annually
$59 a month
What this table does not include, on either side: the cost of somebody actually changing the site. That is the largest line in both columns and it depends entirely on how the site is built, not on which platform it is built with. A Webflow site assembled badly needs a developer for every headline, and then you have swapped a plugin bill for an invoice from us. Figures: Webflow published plans, May 2026. Kinsta published plans. WordPress plugin, maintenance and hosting costs from a published 2026 cost index — sources listed at the foot of this page.
Most comparison pages use these numbers to say WordPress is insecure. That is not what they say. They say the plugin ecosystem is where the risk lives — which matters, because the plugin ecosystem is also the reason most people choose WordPress.
11,334
New vulnerabilities found in the WordPress ecosystem in 2025 — up 42% on 2024
91%
Of them were in plugins. A further 9% were in themes
6
Were in WordPress core itself. The core is not the problem here
46%
Had no patch available on the day they were disclosed
Webflow’s version of this risk is different, not absent. There is no plugin layer, so this whole category of vulnerability does not apply. But you are dependent on one company: when Webflow retires a feature — as it did with User Accounts and Logic — you rebuild on somebody else’s terms, on their timetable. Pick the risk you would rather manage.
If any one of these describes you, do not migrate, and do not let us talk you into it. Every one of them is a hard edge in Webflow rather than a matter of taste.
01
02
03
04
05
06
The part everyone is afraid of is the traffic, and rightly. Here is the order we do it in.
01
Every URL gets mapped before anything is built
We crawl what you have, list every indexed URL, and write the 301 map first. The redirect plan is the deliverable that protects your traffic, and it exists before a single page is designed.
02
Posts and pages move into the CMS as structured content
Not pasted in as rich text. Categories, authors, dates and images become fields, so the blog is still a blog afterwards rather than two hundred orphaned pages.
03
The old site stays up until the new one is proven
You see it on a staging URL, we test the redirect map against the live URL list, and the switch happens when it passes — not on a date somebody promised.
Not if the redirect map is done properly, and that is the whole job. Every indexed URL on the old site gets a tested 301 to its equivalent on the new one, and anything without an equivalent gets a decision rather than a 404. There is usually a wobble for a couple of weeks while Google re-crawls. Anyone who promises you zero movement is guessing.
Yes. They import into the Webflow CMS as structured items — title, body, author, category, date, image — rather than as pasted HTML. Comments are the exception: Webflow has no native comment system, so those either move to a third-party tool or they do not come.
Forms become native Webflow forms, which email you and post to Zapier or Make. What does not survive: anything that relied on a plugin doing server-side work — conditional logic beyond the basics, file-upload workflows, payment forms. We list those before we quote, not after.
Partly, and this is the honest limitation. Webflow exports static HTML, CSS and JavaScript, but the CMS, forms, search and localization do not come with it. WordPress hands you the entire database and file tree, and it runs anywhere. If never being locked in is your first requirement, that is a reason to stay.
On platform and plugins, clearly. On people, only if the build is done in a way your team can actually edit — otherwise you have swapped a plugin bill for a developer bill and saved nothing. That is a fact about how it gets built, not about the platform.
It ran 33.21% of measured sites in April 2026, down from a peak of 35.76% in July 2022. That scale is exactly why there is a plugin for everything, and exactly why there were 11,334 vulnerabilities last year. Popularity explains the ecosystem; it does not make any particular site good.
We will tell you how many indexed pages you have, what the redirect map looks like, and whether moving is worth it. Including when the answer is no.